American Journal of Science Education Research | Research Article ![]()
Generative AI in Omani Higher Education: An Exploratory Study of Practices, Ethics, and Training Needs at Sohar University’s Faculty of Language Studies and Faculty of Law
*Correspondence: Fouad El-karnichi1*, Mounir Snoussi2
DOI: 10.71010/2835-6764/ajser-e348
Published: November 03, 2026
Abstract
Background: Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming ubiquitous in higher education. However, its legitimacy within academia depends on task fit in a specific discipline, students’ knowledge of the technology, and responsible governance practices. This study explored the prevalence of artificial intelligence use, students’ perceptions of its ethical use, and their training needs among undergraduate students of Language Studies and Law at Sohar University in Oman.
Methods: A comparative mixed-methods design was used, with two faculty-specific questionnaires (in English for Language Studies and in Arabic for Law) harmonized into a single dataset. After non-consenting respondents were excluded, the final sample included students from both faculties. Quantitative analysis involved descriptive statistics, Welch’s t-tests, chi-square tests, and Cohen’s d. Qualitative analysis used bilingual, keyword-assisted thematic analysis of three open-ended questions.
Results: Both faculties showed a high prevalence of artificial intelligence use; however, Language Studies students reported a wider range of applications, such as grammar checking, drafting, brainstorming, and translation. Law students showed a significantly better understanding of artificial intelligence and of the ethics of responsible use. Formal training was rare in both faculties, especially in Law.
Conclusion: Use of artificial intelligence is common among students, but its frequency and purposes vary by field: Language Studies students use it more and for more tasks, while Law students are better aware of its responsible use. Institutional management of artificial intelligence should therefore be field-specific and explicit about ethics, keeping authorship with students, requiring disclosure, and teaching verification.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; generative artificial intelligence; higher education; language studies; responsible use of artificial intelligence.
Abbreviations:
AI – artificial intelligence
RQ – research question
SD – standard deviation.
References
- Isiaku L, Kwala AF, Sambo KU, Isiaku HH (2024) Academic evolution in the age of ChatGPT: an in-depth qualitative exploration of its influence on research, learning, and ethics in higher education. J Univ Teach Learn Pract 21(6).
- Liu Y, Park J, McMinn S (2024) Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: students’ perspectives. Int J Appl Linguist 34(4): 1437-1461.
- Zhao X, Cox A (2024) ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. OSF Preprints.
- Gozali I, Wijaya ART, Lie A, Cahyono BY, Suryati N (2024) Leveraging the potential of ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation (AWE) tool: students’ feedback literacy development and AWE tools integration framework. JALT CALL J 20(1): 1-22.
- Lam NTH, Le TND (2024) Stakeholder’s perceptions of ChatGPT in teaching and learning English paragraph writing at Van Lang University. AsiaCALL Online J 15(2): 42-59.
- Shen Y (2024) Investigating Chinese learners’ use and perceptions of ChatGPT in EAP. 2024 12th Int Conf Inf Educ Technol (ICIET): 248-252.
- Syabilla ZF, Romadhon MGE, Mustofa M (2023) Are you creative? What college-level English language learners think of AI writing assistants. VELES 7(3): 456-470.
- Xu T, Jumaat NF (2024) ChatGPT-empowered writing strategies in EFL students’ academic writing: calibre, challenges and chances. Int J Interact Mob Technol 18(15): 95-114.
- Edwards SB (2023) Artificial intelligence in legal services: reducing the gap in access to justice. In: Edwards SB III, Masterson JR (eds) Advances in Public Policy and Administration. IGI Global: 59-79.
- John AM, U AM, Panachakel JT (2023) Ethical challenges of using artificial intelligence in judiciary. 2023 IEEE Int Conf Metrol eXtended Real Artif Intell Neural Eng (MetroXRAINE): 723-728.
- Madaoui N (2024) The impact of artificial intelligence on legal systems: challenges and opportunities. Probl Legality 1(164): 285-303.
- Quteishat EMA (2024) Exploring the role of AI in modern legal practice: opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications. J Electr Syst 20(6s): 3040-3050.
- Vargas-Murillo AR, Pari-Bedoya INMDLA, Turriate-Guzman AM, Delgado-Chávez CA, Sanchez-Paucar F (2024) Transforming justice: implications of artificial intelligence in legal systems. Acad J Interdiscip Stud 13(2): 433.
- Alshamy A, Al-Harthi ASA, Abdullah S (2025) Perceptions of generative AI tools in higher education: insights from students and academics at Sultan Qaboos University. Educ Sci 15(4): 501.
- Yitages M, Kasai A (2024) Faculty opinions of AI tools: text generators and machine translators. Am J Undergrad Res 20(4): 17-27.
- Ali YA, Mooneeb Ali M, Alharbi W, Hamid S, Abbas S (2025) The influence of ChatGPT on English grammar among Saudi ESL learners. Arab World Engl J (1): 358-371.
- Mugableh AI (2024) The impact of ChatGPT on the development of vocabulary knowledge of Saudi EFL students. Arab World Engl J 1(1): 265-281.
- Rezaei M, Salehi H, Tabatabaei O (2024) Uses and misuses of ChatGPT as an AI-language model in academic writing. 2024 10th Int Conf Artif Intell Robot (QICAR): 256-260.
- Dahl M, Magesh V, Suzgun M, Ho DE (2024) Large legal fictions: profiling legal hallucinations in large language models. J Leg Anal 16(1): 64-93.
- Chauhan S, Keprate A (2022) Standards, ethics, legal implications & challenges of artificial intelligence. 2022 IEEE Int Conf Ind Eng Eng Manag (IEEM): 1048-1052.
- Chakraborty D, Subramani D (2025) Development and validation of the Academic AI Usage Scale (AAIUS). Research Square preprint (in review).
